REQUEST FOR HELP!


PKat co-author Jeremy is currently writing a conference paper on the closely-related propositions put forward by the European Court of Justice that
* the more distinctive the earlier mark, the greater the likelihood of confusion with similar marks for the same or similar goods or services (SABEL v Puma)
* the more highly distinctive the mark, the broader the protection it enjoys (Canon v MGM).

One very confused cat seeks help on European Court of Justice case law

He'd very much appreciate any insights from IPKat readers as to whether these principles are sound bases for the protection of registered trade marks or whether they are illogical aberrations. In return, he'll be happy to send a draft of his paper to anyone who wants to see it. Please send your comments to the IPKat.

More on confusion here, here and here
REQUEST FOR HELP! REQUEST FOR HELP! Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, March 20, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.